Man City Tried to BLOCK the Verdict From Leaking. Here's Why.
This isn't just about a trophy asterisk anymore. This is a football institution that could be staring down expulsion from the competition it has dominated for over a decade a competition many now believe it never should have been dominating in the first place.

For years, Manchester City fans have hidden behind three words: "still unproven, still alleged, still nothing found." That shield is gone. The Athletic first reported that City had been found guilty of all but one of the 115 charges by an independent panel. One hundred and fourteen breaches upheld. Not "some." Not "a technicality." Fourteen years of financial doping, laid bare and confirmed. And here's the part City's PR machine can't spin away: when approached, City didn't deny the guilty verdicts, saying only that the process "remains ongoing." Read that again. The club that has spent two years screaming "irrefutable evidence" of innocence could not bring itself to say "we didn't do it." Silence is an admission dressed in a suit.
It gets murkier. A source told ESPN that City sought an injunction to block the initial reporting of the verdict — a club allegedly desperate enough to try to gag the press from telling the world it had been found guilty. If you're innocent, you don't fight to keep the verdict quiet. You shout it from the Etihad roof. So what happens now? The sanctions phase is where this gets biblical for City fans. Nobody knows the exact number yet, but the football world isn't short on informed guesses — and none of them are kind. One Premier League executive laid it out in stark terms: a points deduction so brutal — somewhere in the region of 70 to 80 points — that it would not just dent City's season, it would relegate them outright to the Championship. Not a slap on the wrist. A guillotine. Others reportedly want something even more surgical: a punishment spread across three seasons, gutting City's Champions League qualification hopes year after year after year — a slow strangulation rather than a single execution. Imagine that. Not one bad season, but three consecutive years watching the club that thought it had rewritten football's rulebook scrap for a top-six finish like a mid-table also-ran. And that's before you even get to the money. Football insider Ben Jacobs has warned that City could face billions in lawsuits — not from one angry party, but potentially from City's own rivals, clubs relegated during the years City are alleged to have gained unfair advantage, clubs who missed out on Europe, clubs beaten by a City side operating outside the rules in the Champions League. Layer on top of that potential criminal proceedings and HMRC scrutiny, and you start to understand why insiders are calling the "slap on the wrist" crowd delusional. Let that sink in. This isn't just about a trophy asterisk anymore. This is a football institution that could be staring down expulsion from the competition it has dominated for over a decade — a competition many now believe it never should have been dominating in the first place. Eight Premier League titles. Four in a row. A Champions League. All of it now sits under the shadow of a guilty verdict on the very financial rules that were supposed to keep the game honest. Every title race City "won" in that window, every rival that finished second, third, relegated — while City spent as if the rulebook didn't apply to them — deserves to be looked at again. City will appeal. Of course they will. That's the next chapter, and it could drag this out for months, maybe longer. But an appeal doesn't erase a guilty verdict on 114 charges. It just delays the inevitable reckoning. For thirteen years, City fans have told the rest of English football to be quiet, that the noisy neighbours had simply out-spent and out-thought everyone else fair and square. For thirteen years, rivals and neutrals swallowed their suspicion while City lifted trophy after trophy. That story just collapsed. The panel has spoken. The only question left is how hard the hammer falls — and right now, every signal points to something historic, something ruinous, something that could end with Manchester City playing Championship football while their own supporters wonder what the last decade was actually worth. Buckle up, City fans. The wait for sanctions is the calm before the real storm.
Read next
Stories you should not miss
Related stories
More on Manchester City
Published Saturday, 26 September 2026. Published through the Nisty Football newsroom.
Fan reaction
Comments (0)
Leave a comment
No account needed · 0 approved
0/1500 characters · comments are reviewed before publication
More from Nisty Football
Related stories

THE CITY THREAT: HAS MANCHESTER CITY BECOME TOO POWERFUL FOR FOOTBALL?
A football regulation is not a suggestion. A financial rule is not a rule only for clubs without powerful friend or do football’s rules apply equally when the club involved has enormously powerful owners and extraordinary political and economic connections?

A Man Up, a Goal Ahead, Yet No Victory: Has Michael Carrick Run Out of Answers at Manchester United?
is Carrick struggling to find the answers, or are Manchester United’s problems deeper than their manager?

Silenced? Martínez's Apology Smells Like a Club in Damage Control, and INEOS Has Questions to Answer
Players do not walk back the most honest interview of their season by accident. The club got to him.

EXCLUSIVE: THE CARRICK FORMULA — WHY MANCHESTER UNITED’S NEXT CHAPTER MAY DEMAND A LITTLE MORE ‘FERGUSON’
There is a difference between managing Manchester United and managing Manchester United successfully.





